why was america so
brutally attacked by murderous, self-described defenders of islam?
-------
was the cause, in whole or in part, a
heinous judgment against a freedom-loving people?
-------
or, does history again reveal that policies
which promote interventionism and entangling foreign government affairs are
actual forces of cause and undesirable effects?
if you have taken for granted and
assumed that the media reports the facts, all of the facts, you can compare
notes with those right in the midst of our highest levels of government.
those with ears to hear, read on:
THE
9/11
COMMISSION
REPORT
Final
Report of the
National
Commission on Terrorist
Attacks
Upon the United States
OFFICIAL
GOVERNMENT EDITION
ISBN
0-16-072304-3
=======
pg. xv
We present the narrative of this report and the
recommendations that flow from it to the President of the United States, the
United States Congress, and the American people for their consideration. Ten Commissioners - five Republicans and five
Democrats chosen by elected leaders from our nation’s capital at a time of
great partisan division - have come together to present this report without
dissent.
We have come together with a unity of purpose
because our nation demands it. September
11, 2001, was a day of unprecedented shock and suffering in the history of the
United States. The nation was
unprepared. How did this happen, and how
can we avoid such tragedy again?
To answer these questions, the Congress and the
President created the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United
States (Public Law 107-306, November 27, 2002).
Our mandate was sweeping. The law directed us to investigate “facts and
circumstances relating to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,”
including those relating to intelligence agencies, law enforcement agencies,
diplomacy, immigration issues and border control, the flow of assets to
terrorist organizations, commercial aviation, the role of congressional
oversight and resource allocation, and other areas determined relevant by the
Commission.
In pursuing our mandate, we have reviewed more than
2.5 million pages of documents and interviewed more than 1,200 individuals in
ten countries. This included nearly
every senior official from the current and previous administrations who had
responsibility for topics covered in our mandate.
We have sought to be independent, impartial,
thorough, and nonpartisan. From the
outset, we have been committed to share as much of our investigation as we can
with the American people. To that end,
we held 19 days of hearings and took public testimony from 160 witnesses.
=======
pg. xvi
At the outset of our work, we said we were looking
backward in order to look forward.
=======
pg. 54
But in appealing to societies full of discontent,
Bin Ladin remained credible as other leaders and symbols faded. He could stand as a symbol of resistance -
above all, resistance to the West and to America. He could present himself and his allies as
victorious warriors in the one great successful experience for Islamic
militancy in the 1980s: the Afghan jihad
against the Soviet occupation.
=======
pg. 56
The international environment for Bin Ladin’s
efforts was ideal. Saudi Arabia and the
United States supplied billions of dollars worth of secret assistance to rebel
groups in Afghanistan fighting the Soviet occupation.
=======
pg. 57
Bin
Ladin Moves to Sudan
By the fall of 1989, Bin Ladin had sufficient
stature among Islamic extremists that a Sudanese political leader, Hassan al
Turabi, urged him to transplant his whole organization to Sudan. Turabi headed the National Islamic Front in a
coalition that had recently seized power in Khartoum.30 Bin Ladin agreed to
help Turabi in an ongoing war against African Christian separatists in southern
Sudan and also to do some road building.
Turabi in return would let Bin Ladin use Sudan as a base for worldwide
business operations and for preparations for jihad.
-------
In August 1990, Iraq invaded Kuwait. Bin Ladin,
whose efforts in Afghanistan had earned him celebrity and respect, proposed to
the Saudi monarchy that he summon mujahideen for a jihad to retake Kuwait. He was rebuffed, and the Saudis joined the
U.S.-led coalition. After the Saudis
agreed to allow U.S. armed forces to be based in the Kingdom, Bin Ladin and a
number of Islamic clerics began to publicly denounce the arrangement.
=======
pg. 58
Bin Ladin now had a vision of himself as head of an
international jihad confederation. In
Sudan, he established an “Islamic Army Shura” that was to serve as the
coordinating body for the consortium of terrorist groups with which he was
forging alliances. It was composed of
his own al Qaeda Shura together with leaders or representatives of terrorist organizations
that were still independent.
=======
pg. 59
Bin Ladin began delivering diatribes against the
United States before he left Saudi Arabia.
He continued to do so after he arrived in Sudan. In early 1992, the al Qaeda leadership issued
a fatwa calling for jihad against the Western “occupation” of Islamic lands.
-------
After U.S. troops deployed to Somalia in late 1992,
al Qaeda leaders formulated a fatwa demanding their eviction.
=======
pg. 69
On February 23, 1998, Bin Ladin issued his public
fatwa.
-------
On May 7, the deputy head of al Qaeda’s military
committee, Mohammed Atef, faxed to Bin Ladin’s London office a new fatwa issued
by a group of sheikhs located in Afghanistan.
A week later, it appeared in Al
Quds al Arabi, the same Arabic-language newspaper in London that had first
published Bin Ladin’s February fatwa, and it conveyed the same message - the
duty of Muslims to carry out holy war against the enemies of Islam and to expel
the Americans from the Gulf region.
=======
pg. 70
The attack on the U.S. embassy in Nairobi destroyed
the embassy and killed 12 Americans and 201 others, almost all Kenyans. About 5,000 people were injured. The attack on the U.S. embassy in Dar es Salaam killed 11 more people, none of them
Americans. Interviewed later about the
deaths of the Africans, Bin Ladin answered that “when it becomes apparent that
it would be impossible to repel these Americans without assaulting them, even
if this involved the killing of Muslims, this is permissible under Islam.” Asked if he had indeed masterminded these
bombings, Bin Ladin said that the World Islamic Front for jihad against “Jews
and Crusaders” had issued a “crystal clear” fatwa. If the instigation for jihad against the Jews
and the Americans to liberate the holy places “is considered a crime,” he said,
“let history be a witness that I am a criminal.”
=======
pg. 120
After the United States launched air attacks against
Iraq at the end of 1998 and against Serbia in 1999, in each case provoking
worldwide criticism, Deputy National Security Advisor James Steinberg added the
argument that attacks in Afghanistan offered “little benefit, lots of blowback
against [a] bomb-happy U.S.”
=======
pg. 251
One senior al Qaeda operative claims to recall Bin
Ladin arguing that attacks against the United States needed to be carried out
immediately to support insurgency in the Israeli-occupied territories and
protest the presence of U.S. forces in Saudi Arabia.
=======
pg. 466
3. Usama Bin
Ladin, “Declaration of War Against the Americans
Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places,” Aug. 23, 1996 (trans., online at www.terrorismfiles.org/individuals/declaration_of_jihad1.html
).
=======
pg. 562
4. Opening
the Islamic Conference of Muslim leaders from around the world on October 16,
2003, then Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad said: “Today we, the whole Muslim ummah [community of believers] are
treated with contempt and dishonour. Our
religion is denigrated. Our holy places
desecrated. Our countries are
occupied. Our people are starved and
killed. None of our countries are truly
independent. We are under pressure to
conform to our oppressors’ wishes about how we should behave, how we should
govern our lands, how we should think even.”
He added: “There is a feeling of
hopelessness among the Muslim countries and their people. They feel that they can do nothing
right. They believe that things can only
get worse. The Muslims will forever be
oppressed and dominated by the Europeans and Jews.” The prime minister’s argument was that the
Muslims should gather their assets, not striking back blindly, but instead
planning a thoughtful, long-term strategy to defeat their worldwide enemies,
which he argued were controlled by the Jews.
“But today the Jews rule the world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for
them.” Speech at the
Opening of the Tenth Session of the Islamic Summit Conference, Oct. 16, 2003
comment [at]
zeromotivation [dot] com
© 2008 | zeroMotivation