why was america so brutally attacked by murderous, self-described defenders of islam?


was the cause, in whole or in part, a heinous judgment against a freedom-loving people?


or, does history again reveal that policies which promote interventionism and entangling foreign government affairs are actual forces of cause and undesirable effects?



if you have taken for granted and assumed that the media reports the facts, all of the facts, you can compare notes with those right in the midst of our highest levels of government.


those with ears to hear, read on:




THE 9/11




Final Report of the

National Commission on Terrorist

Attacks Upon the United States






ISBN 0-16-072304-3




pg. xv


We present the narrative of this report and the recommendations that flow from it to the President of the United States, the United States Congress, and the American people for their consideration.  Ten Commissioners - five Republicans and five Democrats chosen by elected leaders from our nation’s capital at a time of great partisan division - have come together to present this report without dissent.

We have come together with a unity of purpose because our nation demands it.  September 11, 2001, was a day of unprecedented shock and suffering in the history of the United States.  The nation was unprepared.  How did this happen, and how can we avoid such tragedy again?

To answer these questions, the Congress and the President created the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (Public Law 107-306, November 27, 2002).

Our mandate was sweeping.  The law directed us to investigate “facts and circumstances relating to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,” including those relating to intelligence agencies, law enforcement agencies, diplomacy, immigration issues and border control, the flow of assets to terrorist organizations, commercial aviation, the role of congressional oversight and resource allocation, and other areas determined relevant by the Commission.

In pursuing our mandate, we have reviewed more than 2.5 million pages of documents and interviewed more than 1,200 individuals in ten countries.  This included nearly every senior official from the current and previous administrations who had responsibility for topics covered in our mandate.

We have sought to be independent, impartial, thorough, and nonpartisan.  From the outset, we have been committed to share as much of our investigation as we can with the American people.  To that end, we held 19 days of hearings and took public testimony from 160 witnesses.




pg. xvi


At the outset of our work, we said we were looking backward in order to look forward.




pg. 54


But in appealing to societies full of discontent, Bin Ladin remained credible as other leaders and symbols faded.  He could stand as a symbol of resistance - above all, resistance to the West and to America.  He could present himself and his allies as victorious warriors in the one great successful experience for Islamic militancy in the 1980s:  the Afghan jihad against the Soviet occupation.




pg. 56


The international environment for Bin Ladin’s efforts was ideal.  Saudi Arabia and the United States supplied billions of dollars worth of secret assistance to rebel groups in Afghanistan fighting the Soviet occupation.




pg. 57


Bin Ladin Moves to Sudan

By the fall of 1989, Bin Ladin had sufficient stature among Islamic extremists that a Sudanese political leader, Hassan al Turabi, urged him to transplant his whole organization to Sudan.  Turabi headed the National Islamic Front in a coalition that had recently seized power in Khartoum.30 Bin Ladin agreed to help Turabi in an ongoing war against African Christian separatists in southern Sudan and also to do some road building.  Turabi in return would let Bin Ladin use Sudan as a base for worldwide business operations and for preparations for jihad.




In August 1990, Iraq invaded Kuwait. Bin Ladin, whose efforts in Afghanistan had earned him celebrity and respect, proposed to the Saudi monarchy that he summon mujahideen for a jihad to retake Kuwait.  He was rebuffed, and the Saudis joined the U.S.-led coalition.  After the Saudis agreed to allow U.S. armed forces to be based in the Kingdom, Bin Ladin and a number of Islamic clerics began to publicly denounce the arrangement.




pg. 58


Bin Ladin now had a vision of himself as head of an international jihad confederation.  In Sudan, he established an “Islamic Army Shura” that was to serve as the coordinating body for the consortium of terrorist groups with which he was forging alliances.  It was composed of his own al Qaeda Shura together with leaders or representatives of terrorist organizations that were still independent.




pg. 59


Bin Ladin began delivering diatribes against the United States before he left Saudi Arabia.  He continued to do so after he arrived in Sudan.  In early 1992, the al Qaeda leadership issued a fatwa calling for jihad against the Western “occupation” of Islamic lands.




After U.S. troops deployed to Somalia in late 1992, al Qaeda leaders formulated a fatwa demanding their eviction.




pg. 69


On February 23, 1998, Bin Ladin issued his public fatwa.




On May 7, the deputy head of al Qaeda’s military committee, Mohammed Atef, faxed to Bin Ladin’s London office a new fatwa issued by a group of sheikhs located in Afghanistan.  A week later, it appeared in Al Quds al Arabi, the same Arabic-language newspaper in London that had first published Bin Ladin’s February fatwa, and it conveyed the same message - the duty of Muslims to carry out holy war against the enemies of Islam and to expel the Americans from the Gulf region.




pg. 70


The attack on the U.S. embassy in Nairobi destroyed the embassy and killed 12 Americans and 201 others, almost all Kenyans.  About 5,000 people were injured.  The attack on the U.S. embassy in Dar es Salaam killed 11 more people, none of them Americans.  Interviewed later about the deaths of the Africans, Bin Ladin answered that “when it becomes apparent that it would be impossible to repel these Americans without assaulting them, even if this involved the killing of Muslims, this is permissible under Islam.”  Asked if he had indeed masterminded these bombings, Bin Ladin said that the World Islamic Front for jihad against “Jews and Crusaders” had issued a “crystal clear” fatwa.  If the instigation for jihad against the Jews and the Americans to liberate the holy places “is considered a crime,” he said, “let history be a witness that I am a criminal.”




pg. 120


After the United States launched air attacks against Iraq at the end of 1998 and against Serbia in 1999, in each case provoking worldwide criticism, Deputy National Security Advisor James Steinberg added the argument that attacks in Afghanistan offered “little benefit, lots of blowback against [a] bomb-happy U.S.”




pg. 251


One senior al Qaeda operative claims to recall Bin Ladin arguing that attacks against the United States needed to be carried out immediately to support insurgency in the Israeli-occupied territories and protest the presence of U.S. forces in Saudi Arabia.




pg. 466


3.  Usama Bin Ladin, “Declaration of War Against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places,” Aug. 23, 1996 (trans., online at www.terrorismfiles.org/individuals/declaration_of_jihad1.html ).




pg. 562


4.  Opening the Islamic Conference of Muslim leaders from around the world on October 16, 2003, then Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad said:  “Today we, the whole Muslim ummah [community of believers] are treated with contempt and dishonour.  Our religion is denigrated.  Our holy places desecrated.  Our countries are occupied.  Our people are starved and killed.  None of our countries are truly independent.  We are under pressure to conform to our oppressors’ wishes about how we should behave, how we should govern our lands, how we should think even.”  He added:  “There is a feeling of hopelessness among the Muslim countries and their people.  They feel that they can do nothing right.  They believe that things can only get worse.  The Muslims will forever be oppressed and dominated by the Europeans and Jews.”  The prime minister’s argument was that the Muslims should gather their assets, not striking back blindly, but instead planning a thoughtful, long-term strategy to defeat their worldwide enemies, which he argued were controlled by the Jews.  “But today the Jews rule the world by proxy.  They get others to fight and die for them.”  Speech at the Opening of the Tenth Session of the Islamic Summit Conference, Oct. 16, 2003







comment [at] zeromotivation [dot] com

© 2008  |  zeroMotivation